To add a little something of an uplifting nature (for a change), I’ve added this short video which captures a group singing a great Christmas carol in a Capella! Pretty talented!!
That’s Christmas to Me
To add a little something of an uplifting nature (for a change), I’ve added this short video which captures a group singing a great Christmas carol in a Capella! Pretty talented!!
“To be forewarned, is to be forearmed.” — unknown
Although people today primarily focus on ‘feeling good’, they should consider things may not be the same tomorrow as they are today. (i.e., the ‘normalcy bias‘.) We here in the U.S. are changing… rapidly — economically as well socially. And to prepare financially is a wise consideration for the near future.
I have read several articles on this subject and learned of numerous financial prognosticators’ projections for the 2015-2025 time-frame. To say the least, none of them are good. As such, I am including a few links here for your reading to hear what is expected. Being safe is better than being sorry. And being prepared for the worst and hoping for the best has served me well for several decades. These are links you won’t typically see elsewhere.
Everything Is Just Fine…? — We hear things are good, are they?
The Last Gasp — What is happening globally?
The Seven Year Cycle — There are cycles in economies.
Economic Cycle Theorists — Economic cycles do exist, about four of them.
It is understandable that corporations have the motivation to survive, just like any other human. However, like their human counterparts, they should consider the ‘other guy’ as well as themselves.
As a continuation of my recent article ‘Living and Working in the U.S.A.‘, I received an update from the friend who sent the email included in that article. Just when you think you are totally shocked at how a corporation could be so calloused and impersonal, you see even worse behavior.
His update (paraphrased for security reasons) goes something like this:
After working a little more than 15 hours per week all year, they were told that their salary (hourly wage) would be cut by 30%, effective immediately, until January.
In their notification, they were told that this action was of a ‘confidential nature’ and that they could not share it with anyone inside or outside of IBM. In short, if the tree falls in the forest and no one is told, I guess the tree really didn’t fall..?
I guess the main reason I enter this article is to inform the public that corporate America is really in trouble. If one of the top bluechip corporations in this country behaves in this manner, one should ask who else takes such actions. And, how much of a recovery do we really have?
And for those of you who invest in IBM, you should find the following article by Forbes to be of import.
You’ve heard the politicians discuss this subject on radio and TV. But why would it be bad? Ted Cruz explains in the brief video below. Although he approaches the subject from a practical standpoint, I would argue the politicians want to quiet the opposition so that they will only hear the propaganda the government wants us to hear! Let’s hear it for those Stalin wanna-be’s. “Don’t taz my message bro!”
We constantly hear how the economy is improving and things are going to be great any day now. And those of us who are still working are happy with our situation. If we’re retired, we’re probably not happy with interest rates and our income — not to mention the cost of living. (But hey, the CPI is till way below 2%, right?!)
In 1993 I was working for one of the top IT service bureaus in the U.S. Although we were doing great, the corporation wasn’t. Once things got desperate enough, they sold the IT division off via an outsourcing contract to IBM to whitewash their books — and it worked… for awhile.
So, one day I had my old badge taken and I was given a shiny new IBM badge. I thought, “Great this should be a good deal in the long run. Right?” Not so fast, it was about that time that IBM hired Lou Gershner as their new CEO (aka, the ‘hatchet man’).
Shortly after he started his ‘house cleaning’. In 1993 IBM had 400,000 employes world wide. Of them, 250,000 were inside the U.S. When Lou was done, he had cut 150,000 employes!! Wow! Those were lean days!
Since, IBM has grown back to 400,000 employes. However there are now only 60-90K within the U.S. (depending on who you ask). BUT, there are rumors afoot suggesting they intend to cut another 28% of employes within the U.S.!!! And people wonder why our economy is stalling..?!
The narrative below is from an email I received recently from a guy who I worked/consulted with (remotely). He once made about the same salary as I, but got laid off for over two years. He was subsequently called back at half his salary with no benefits!! But, he was at least glad he had stopped the hemorrhaging from his 401K to pay bills. Now today, he has been cut back to part-time employment and is back to struggling with day to day expenses.
My point is, he does not count when it comes to ‘ reporting unemployment‘. Read his update from him below (as an example) and learn the fate of thousands of people within this country (who’s stories are not reported) and ask yourself, how will these people survive in the near future?!
I’ve been working 32-hour weeks most of the year. I managed to get a full 40-hour week only three weeks this year (it was only 13 weeks last year). Then in mid-September, as part of cost cutting, I was told to stop support of all of the internal systems (there were well over 100 separate mainframe systems involved). My management escalated this decision to a fairly high level They said “Nope. And if things break, they break. So be it.”
But it gets even better. I was also told I could not fill the week with the commercial accounts I support. I can only work the average of what I billed to commercial the past quarter. So, since the first of October, I am limited to working a little over 15 hours per week (that’s 38% of a normal work week). So I only work Mondays and Tuesdays. And I’m also back to taking early withdrawals from my retirement savings to pay the bills. I don’t
have much left after dipping into it the two years I was unable to find work when I was first let go.
On top of that, my teammate was also told to take off over 27 days without pay from mid-October until the end of the financial year (and the four days the company is closed
around Thanksgiving and Christmas do not count). So he is basically working only 42% of a regular schedule. So there isn’t much coverage at all.
Who knows what’s going to happen after the first of the year? Rumor has it on the site where employees are posting what else is happening that there could be another massive layoff between now and the end of February.
I was talking to someone in one of the security auditing groups today, and even though their work levels have not gone down, their headcount has been reduced in the past year from 40 people to 13. That could explain why it took them four months to complete a simple userid request I submitted back in July.
Even though the company publicly gave up on that “Road Map 2015” plan and the $20 EPS goal, they are still in cutting mode. I suspect they still have bonuses and stock options geared to the stock price, as they just announced that they are going to spend
another $5 Billion buying back the stock! And that’s not cash they have on hand. They’re going to BORROW the money to do that!
It reminds me of the famous line that Wimpy used to say in the old Popeye cartoons: “I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” Only I suspect that none of the people
in Armonk plan to be anywhere in sight when Tuesday rolls around.
It’s obvious that all they are interested in is raiding all of the money possible for themselves, then they will bail, with no concern with the thousands of lives they have destroyed.
The modern day version of rape and pillage.
Meanwhile, Google announced that they will INVEST $1.2 Billion in things like space exploration, aviation, rover/robotics and other emerging technologies.
I’m in job search mode – AGAIN – and it is worse than it was for me in 2005. Of course, I’m now nine years older (I turned 59 last month). As you probably know from your own job searches, no one cares about your overall knowledge. You can only do what you’ve done the last 2, 3, or 5+ years. There is no room for learning anymore. If you didn’t do it full time, it doesn’t count.
Part of this may be that “con game” I’ve read so much about the past few years. Companies post job openings with a laundry list of unrealistic requirements, then bemoan the fact that there are
supposedly no qualified Americans for those jobs. Next they go begging the government for more H-1B visas to bring over here “skilled” workers from foreign countries. Which was their goal all along — bring in basically slave labor at the expense of the hard working and dedicated Americans.
Unfortunately I’m now singing the comedian Dennis Leary’s song “It’s a Merry F***ing Christmas”. Ho. Ho. Ho.
Considering that 70% of our current GDP consists of ‘consumption’ within the U.S., how will this situation improve our national economy? If we don’t get more people back to work in this country, how will we survive in the long run?
P.S.
Maybe it would be a good idea to get rid of that IBM stock you’ve grown so fond of.?!
I have stated numerous times that everyone evaluates people with one standard, from the time they’re old enough to make the slightest decisions — ‘actions speak louder than words‘.
If the American public were to use that most basic standard of evaluation with our president, they would see a terrifying revelation — that he has a less than positive objective for this country. And apparently I am not alone in this view.
Although not new, I am making an interview (audio file) available for your review. Former Colorado Governor Richard Lamm (D) was interviewed on October 18, 2003 and made these statements on air. His comments were made available to the public on Mar 26, 2014 via Mark Levin. If Lamm (D) gets it, one would hope everyone would get it. But based on what I hear on radio and TV, the public is still apparently in denial and/or the dark.
Please click on the link below. It should be frightening to most..?
I find it amazing how disingenuous the left can really be. Elitists just seem to have no shame nor limits to the level arrogance they can reach and/or project!?!
Diane Feinstein, as an example, continually fights to take 2nd amendment rights away from her constituents and the American people. Yet, besides any security she has personally, she carries a .380 auto handgun with her everywhere she goes.!? She exemplifies the degree to which one person can loath the American people from her lofty perch. Please read the following quote by her in the Los Angeles Times.
Dianne Feinstein: “All vets are mentally ill in some way and government should prevent them from owning firearms.”
Yep, – she really said it on Thursday in a meeting in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee…. and the quote below from the LA Times is priceless. Sometimes even the L.A. Times gets it right.
Kurt Nimmo: “Senator Feinstein insults all U.S. Veterans as she flays about in a vain attempt to save her anti-firearms bill.”
Columnist Burt Prelutsky, Los Angeles Times
“Frankly, I don’t know what it is about California, but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I’m not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we’re Number One. There’s no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on ‘ Macbeth ‘. The four of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don’t know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words.”
The following was copied from a newsletter I receive often regarding our economy and current world economics. The quotes presented here below were intended to offset the grossly ‘spun’ numbers presented by two economists from Berkley, California.
… a now-famous study by Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, professors of economics at the Paris School of Economics and the University of California, Berkeley, respectively. Whether the issue is climate change or income inequality, however, problems with the underlying data significantly distort the debate. [Click on ‘study‘ above to read the full report. The retort to this study follows.]
… America is the freest and most dynamic society in history, and freedom and equality of outcome have never coexisted anywhere at any time. Here the innovator, the first mover, the talented and the persistent win out—producing large income inequality. The prizes are unequal because, in our system, consumers reward people for the value they add. Some can and do add extraordinary value, others can’t or don’t [won’t?].
How exactly are we poorer because Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and the Walton family are so rich? Mr. Gates became rich by mainstreaming computer power into our lives and in the process made us better off. Mr. Buffett’s genius improves the efficiency of capital allocation and the whole economy benefits. Wal-Mart stretches our buying power and raises the living standards of millions of Americans, especially low-income earners. Rich people don’t “take” a large share of national income, they “bring” it. The beauty of our system is that everybody benefits from the value they bring.
Yes, income is 24% less equally distributed here than in the average of the other 34 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). But OECD figures show that U.S. per capita GDP is 42% higher, household wealth is 210% higher and median disposable income is 42% higher. How many Americans would give up 42% of their income to see the rich get less?
Vast new fortunes were earned in the 25-year boom that began under Reagan and continued under Clinton. But the income of middle-class Americans rose significantly. These incomes have fallen during the Obama presidency, and not because the rich have gotten richer. They’ve fallen because bad federal policies have yielded the weakest recovery in the postwar history of America.
Yet even as the recovery continues to disappoint, the president increasingly turns to the politics of envy by demanding that the rich pay their “fair share.” The politics of envy may work here as it has worked so often in Latin America and Europe, but the economics of envy is failing in America as it has failed everywhere else.
Mr. Gramm, a former Republican senator from Texas, is a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Solon was a budget adviser to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and is a partner of US Policy Metrics.
Imagine if we could get out of the current ‘Carter era’ mentality economics and return to the Reagan approach. You too could possibly be a mere 42% richer in income in the near future..!? You’d probably love that compared to the current estimated 6% increase (high estimate) the average American has received since 2009!!
I don’t normally copy emails sent to me, but in this case I will make an exception. It doesn’t take a great deal of study to realize that the points made in the following text are real and very believable (given what we already know about Obama). For years now we have had questions regarding birth, background, etc. of our current mysterious president. But, the following facts regarding his personal connections is, in total, shocking.
Obama
Valerie Jarrett also
Bernardine Dohrn
Obama, Sr.
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
How’s that for coincidence folks..!?
I thought y’all might enjoy this audio clip from a radio show last week (Nov. 6th). I called into the radio station KSFO in San Francisco to talk to Brian Susseman. He was discussing California’s state congress and how they are a full time congress and get very little done. When he asked what Texas had for a congress, that’s when I called in.
You might find this interview funny to listen to. I showed a parallel between the two states and how we here in Texas are doing things the ‘normal’ (right) way, vs. the wild and weird Kalifornia way!!?
KSFO Radio Interview of Phil Vasile
The audio file is the Nov. 6th, 6am hour. Skip to the 16 minute point to hear the beginning of our talk.