Category Archives: Politics

Politically based stories and commentaries

Politics, Public Interest

There May Be Hope.!?

Leave a comment

Everyone is upset because our country is ‘falling apart’ at the seams.  I would agree.  But the problem is more ‘the people’ vs. the politicians.  If ‘we the people’ got off our dead butts and voted, maybe we wouldn’t be in this predicament.?!  Better yet, if we kept our original ‘American values’ (i.e., biblical value system), we probably wouldn’t be in this situation.

If you do the research you’ll find that the ‘traditionalists’ of today (70 somethings) have conservative values much like the founders of our constitution.  As time passed in recent decades however, we have slipped into a mindset of much more liberal thinking.  Given the ‘progressive’ influences within the U.S., it is understandable that we are where we are today.

But, there’s apparently good news on the horizon.  It would seem that there is at least some evidence that the newest generation may be swinging back to the ‘right’.  The following article explains how the kids in school today are taking on traits similar to the ‘older generation’ (that would be me).  Funny thing, the author describes my 17 year old grand-daughter to a tee!

A New Generation of Conservatives

I sure hope he’s right!!?

 

 

.

 

Economics, Education, Politics, Public Interest

The Little Book of Liberal Lies

48 Comments

We receive a lot of electoral and political ‘junk mail’ soliciting money of course.  But occasionally we receive something worth reading.  One of those items came to us about a week ago and I just got around to reading it and thought it should be shared with everyone!

Senator Elbert Guillory is a current sitting official who in 2013 said he had enough.  It was then that he switched from the Democratic Party to the Republican party — much like many blacks during Lincoln’s time.  He indicated that the Democrat Party proved to him they did not have the ‘black’ interest at heart.

Having held a few years as a Republican he decided to write, publish, and distribute to Republican voters his subject booklet so that everyone knew what was really going on in politics and who is supporting blacks — not just saying nice platitudes.  After reading his booklet I decided to retype it (abridged) so that even more people can know what is really going on in Washington.  The following is a duplication of that information for your review.  Please share it with everyone so that they know the lies being told for decades.

 

Little Book of Liberal Lies

by Senator Guillory

The three lies the left uses to enslave black Americans and quotes by well know politicians over several decades of progressive influence.

To my black brothers or sister.

In 2013 I made national headlines when I abandoned the government plantation and party of disappointment.  Otherwise known as the Democratic Party.

My reason?  Democrats have hijacked and enslaved black America for their own power while destroying the black community.  Now I’m fighting to break those chains once and for all.  That’s why my campaign and I set you this “Little Book of Liberal Lies“.  Not only does this booklet give leftists a well-deserved tongue lashing, it also exposes the top three lies they use to keep black Americans like you in chains.

If nothing else, I hope your eyes are opened to the fact that Hillary Clinton and ALL liberals don’t care about me and you — the black community or freedom.  They only care about one thing:  Control.

After reading this, I pray you’ll join me today by rejecting your moder day slave masters and abandon the Democratic plantation and party of disappointment while turning to the true party of freedom — the party of Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

God bless you — Senator Elbert Guillory

Liberal Lie #1

‘All Republicans are racists’

If I exposed this lie to other black Americans, the Democrats would lose their stranglehold of the black community.  And if they lost that, they’d lose what they want most — CONTROL.

So these racist democrats tried to silence me by blasting me as an Oreo, Uncle Tom, and Race Traitor.  Ironic right?  Democrats celebrate themselves as the party of diversity and acceptance, but as soon as I leave t heir plantation, they start lashing me with their verbal whips.  The following are a few more examples of similar behavior.

President Woodrow Wilson (D) — Racist Father of Modern day progressivism

“The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation — until at the last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.”

President Harry S. Truman — The savior of WWII

“I think one man is just as good as another so long as he’s not a n*gger or a Chinaman.  Uncle Will says that the Lord made a white man from dust, a n*gger from mud, then He threw up what was left and it came down a Chinaman.  He does hate Chinese and Japs.  So do I.  It is race prejudice I guess.  But I am strongly of the opinion Negroes ought to be in Africa.  Yellow men in Asia, and White men in Europe and America.”

President Lyndon B. Johnson — Creator of the so-called ‘Great Society’

“I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”

President Bill Clinton — ‘Slick Willie’

“A few years ago, [Barack Obama] would have been getting us coffee.”

Senator Harry Reid — from Arizona

“…a ‘light-skinned’ African America [Obama] ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”

Joe Biden — Obama’s Vice-president

“you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice looking guy.  I mean, that’s a storybook man.”

Rev. Al Sharpton — 1994 speech at Kean College, NJ

“White folks was in caves while we was building empires…  We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”

Jessie Jackson — 1996

“There is nothing more painful to me …  than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved.”

Hillary Clinton — To political operative Paul Fray 1996

“They [black youths] are often the kinds of kids that are called ‘super-predators’, no conscience, no empathy, we can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel.”

Margaret Sanger (Modern-day influence for birth control)  — Hillary Clinton’s self stated role model

Sanger created what eventually became the ‘Planned Parenthood Federation of America’.  The same group that has aborted millions of black babies.  Her view on blacks:  “Colored people are like human weeds and need to be exterminated.”

Liberal Lie #2

‘Democrats are champions of civil liberties’

  1. The Democratic Party created the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) after the Confederacy’s defeat in the Civil War.  An estimated 3,446 black Republicans and 1,297 white Republicans were lynched by the KKK between 1882 and 1968.
  2. Jim Crow segregation laws in the South were created by Democrats looking to overturn Republican civil rights laws.
  3. Democrats supported the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision that said, “a negro whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., and sold as slaves”, whether enslaved or free, could not be an American citizen.  The decision was 7-2 with ALL 7 Democrat judges voting in favor and the Republican and Whig dissenting.
  4. Immediately after taking office in 1913, President Woodrow Wilson (D) fired most blacks who worked in the Federal government and re-segregated the Treasury Department, Mail Service and the Navy.
  5. Governor George Wallace (D) stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, fighting to keep segregation permanent.
  6. Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene Connor in Birmingham, Alabama unleashed attack dogs and turned the fire hoses on civil rights demonstrators.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of the Democrat’s racist history.  As much as Democrats don’t want black Americans to know about this, they really don’t want you to know that the Republican Party is the real party of civil rights.  Somehow Democrats have whitewashed history to cover up the facts.

  1. The Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an abolitionist movement with one simple creed:  Slavery is a violation of the rights of man.
  2. Famous African American abolitionist Frederick Douglass calls the Republicans the “party of freedom and progress”.
  3. The first Republican President was Abraham Lincoln — the author of the Emancipation Proclamation.  Freeing the slaves was a big deal, much to the horror of Democrats.
  4. Republicans in Congress authored the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.  Congressional Republicans unanimously backed the 13th Amendment banning slavery while 63% of Democrats Senators and 78% of Democrat House members voted against it.
  5. 94% of Republican Senators and 96% of Republican House members voted in favor of the 14th Amendment, guaranteeing due process of law to blacks and all Americans.  All Congressional Democrats voted against it.
  6. Nearly all Congressional Republicans voted in favor of passing the 15th Amendment guaranteeing blacks the right to vote.  Every single Democrat voted ‘no’.
  7. President Dwight Eisenhower (R) championed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and was unanimously supported by Republicans.  Democrats in the ?Senate filibustered it.

 

Liberal Lie #3

“The Democrat’s Agenda is best for black Americans”

The Democratic Party has created the illusion that their agenda and policies are what’s best for black people.  In fact, the heart of liberalism is the belief that only a great, all powerful central government can be the benefactor of social justice for all Americans.

Democrats love control — the empty suits disguise control as charity.  But they’re only ‘charitable’ with other people’s money.  And that’s exactly how they control and enslave black Americans. Slavery still exists through government controlled programs like welfare, food stamps, etc.

Liberal policies have failed the black community  Black Americans vote over 90% Democrat, but our communities are just as poor as they’ve always been!  Or have been completely razed!  Just look at Detroit.  A liberal controlled hell-hole.

Our schools continue to fail children.  And liberals refuse to allow school vouchers while at the same time sending their kids to the best private schools.  Our prisons are filled with too many young men who should be at home raising their children and caring for their family.  But here’s the bottom line…

Liberalism has destroyed black America.  Liberals don’t care about liberty.  They don’t care about [your] freedom.  Liberals could care less about African Americans like me and you.  That’s why I decided to leave the Democratic party for good in 2013.  Most people said it was a bold decision.  I don’t think so.  I think it was the right decision – not only for me, but for all my brothers and sisters in the black community.

The Republican Party is the party of freedom.  That’s a word that’s tossed around so frequently today that it’s become a cliche‘.

Here’s what freedom means to me and my black brothers and sisters.  Freedom is:  the idea that the economy must remain free of government persuasion;  the idea that the press must operate without government intrusion and actually hold our leaders feet to the fire.

We may finally all echo the words of one Republican leader who famously said…

“Free at last, free at last.  Thank God almighty, we are free at last.” — Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Please share this information with as many people as possible.  The progressives in this country are doing their best to pervert our history and depend on us to keep ourselves ignorant of what the truth is in America.  If you’ve ever wondered why we’re going downhill fast, this is one of the major reasons.

 

 

 

.

Politics, Religion

9/11 vs. 11/9

Leave a comment

During a discussion last week we came across an interesting ‘coincidence’.??  Everyone knows about 9/11 and what it stands for in this country.  But here’s another interesting date — 11/9.

This coming November we (should) all go a voting poll to determine who our next president will be — the highest powered world leader!  And when does that happen?  On November 8th.  So what is the following day?  Uhhh…  the 9th.!?

I realize that November 9th comes every year, but how often do we have such an important election decision made of this huge importance?  Once again, this could be the biggest decision the people of this country make for a long time.

But my point is (being a ‘believer’), what has the bible to say?  We’ve had a lot of ‘signs’ recently regarding warnings to this country — some of which I’ve written about in this blog.  Well, here’s another one…

I looked up verses in the Christian bible with chapters ‘9’ and verses ’11’.  I found two which were attention getting.

Daniel 9:
11 — All Israel has transgressed your law and turned away, refusing to obey you. “Therefore the curses and sworn judgments written in the Law of Moses, the servant of God, have been poured out on us, because we have sinned against you.

Revelation 9:
11 — They had as king over them the angel of the Abyss, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon and in Greek is Apollyon (that is, Destroyer).

Now consider what happened on 9/11 and what we’re about to do on 11/9.  Read these verses again and ask yourself, ‘does this have anything to do with America’?  Maybe?

Personally I’m not a big believer in ‘coincidence’…

 

 

.

 

Politics, Public Interest, Technology

September 30th — Internet ‘Change’?

1 Comment

As if we don’t have enough trouble in this world, we now have our ‘administration’ attempting to give control of the world’s internet to of all organizations, the U.N.  Being the largest collection of despots one can imagine, it is reasonable to assume that censorship would be right around the corner with such a group in charge.

The following article information is from the Wallstreet Journal and Washington Post — one scary proposition.  Hopefully someone will come to the rescue and save the internet.

 

The first step toward the global suppression of free speech on the Internet will take place at midnight on September 30, when the Obama administration cedes control of the World Wide Web to foreign interests.

L. Gordon Crovitz of The Washington Post has penned two pieces outlining the collision course of American free speech. The first, “Stop Obama’s Internet Giveaway” in March, 2016, and a recent follow-up piece called “An Internet Giveaway to the U.N.” discuss the potential fallout of not preventing President Obama from allowing a government contract with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to expire.

Under Obama’s direction, the Commerce Department was charged with ending American oversight and ensure that foreign entities could not make an internet power grab.  Crovitz rightly disagrees with that outcome, stating that “because of the (Obama) administration’s naiveté or arrogance, U.N. control is the likely result if the U.S. gives up internet stewardship…”

Without a U.S. agreement to operate with antitrust exemptions, ICANN would likely seek to be overseen by another agency, organization or foreign power. As a non-profit, the body’s rules and regulations are determined by a board and the shift would be a tremendous opportunity for countries that routinely suppress free speech, such as Russia and China, to infiltrate, gain authority and impose their worldviews on a global scale.

Likewise, the Obama administration has been no friend to free speech. Government employees in the administration have already been accused of suppressing opposing political views.

In particular, the Internal Revenue Service came under scrutiny for targeting conservative political groups and impeding their ability to gain non-profit status before the last presidential election.

In a recent article, The Daily Wire charges that “The lobbying for the end of U.S. control of the Internet intensified due to Edward Snowden. After Snowden’s leaks of the National Security Agency’s government surveillance emerged, ICANN and other foreign governments used the U.S.’s use of surveillance in other countries as reason to end U.S. control of Internet governance.”

Snowden, a whistleblower, leaked classified information which many viewed as war crimes by the U.S. military to the non-profit journalistic organization WikiLeaks. Snowden has been living as an exile in Russia and has been charged in absentia by the United States under the 1917 Espionage Act for absconding with classified documents.

In recent months, WikiLeaks also made a splash by releasing Democratic National Committee communications that suggested the party skewed its dealing against presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.

Although shutting down an online organization such as WikiLeaks would run contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment, countries like Russia and China, among others, may be more inclined to end the dissemination of such sensitive materials. Under a different set of standards, such information could be kept from the public going forward.

The Daily Wire goes on to point out that once the U.S. surrenders control over ICANN, “it will likely fall under the (International Telecommunications Unit) ITU’s control and risk being subject to censorship.”

Journalists at both The Daily Wire and Wall Street Journal agree that handing over control could have dangerous ramifications.

“Even more chilling is the fact that ITU had passed a treaty that provided ‘authority to governments to close off their citizens’ access to the global Internet'” and creating ‘a digital Iron Curtain.'”

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Wisconsin Sen. Sean Duffy have introduced a bill to stop the shift in internet power and Investor’s Business Daily noted as far back as three years ago Cruz was concerned about this day arriving.

“The likes of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Chinese President Xi Jinping should not dictate what can be read, written, distributed, bought and sold on the internet,” the former presidential candidate wrote. “Countries that do not give their own people the right to speak freely deserve no say in what Americans can say and do on the internet.”

The Texas senator has also called for potential administrative regulations to prevent opening this Pandora’s Box. And even before the clock strikes midnight on U.S. free speech protections, the seeds of China’s influence are already being sown.

ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé recently agreed to become a senior advisor to China’s World Internet Conference, which is an organization Beijing has developed directly to compete with ICANN. According to The Washington Post, “Its goal is to replace the open Internet with full government control and global censorship.”

When confronted by Sen. Cruz about China’s internet censorship and relationship with ICANN, Chehade appeared to threaten that if the America retains oversight, it “would have grave repercussions on the U.S.”

Recent studies show that 66 percent of Americans oppose relinquishing control of the internet and 69 percent say that it’s either “somewhat” or “very likely” that a country like China, Russia or Iran would attempt to seize control.

As University of Surrey Prof. Alan Woodward succinctly put it, this is “about who officially controls the foundations of the internet/web addresses and domain names, without which the network wouldn’t function.”

 

 

 

.

 

Islam, Politics, Public Interest

Criminal vs. Cultural Behavior

Leave a comment

If a person here in America commits a crime, we typically see it as an ‘anomaly’.  They’re obviously defective in some way..?  But what if the perpetrator believes there is nothing wrong with his behavior?  Is that better or worse than the first case mentioned?

I write on this topic because we are bringing into this country thousands of ‘refugees’ who are ‘fleeing oppression’.  Yet many of those people represent a much higher crime rate than the average American citizen.  If their culture says criminal behavior (to us) is alright, are they a bad person?  Consider the following example and then ask yourself if we want more of this behavior and social viewpoint?

Cultural Differences

Imagine if you will our future, say in 2050.  What do you think our country would look like if we continue this insanity?  How do you think our grand children will like it?  Worse, the great-grand children!

 

.

 

Financial, Islam, Politics, Public Interest

Warm and Fuzzy or Sharp and Prickly?

Leave a comment

Americans are truly the most welcoming, accepting, generous people on the planet — all good traits.  But with all strengths often come weaknesses.  Our soft hearts for others (and sometimes heads) often find themselves prey for those who are absent American values.

Immigration in this country has gone on for decades — illegally.  Before that people around the world were happy to do anything to get into and stay in this country.  Many of those people became successes with wealth beyond what they originally believed possible.  But today, the attitude is much like to many of those in this country — you have it, I deserve it, you should give it to me — if not, I’ll steal it!

Am I saying all current immigrants are thieves?  No.  But what I am saying is, we are in trouble and far too many are not just willing, but happy to see us destroyed.  When will this be obvious to the majority in America??  My answer, not soon enough.

Read the following blog entry and then ask yourself if you are willing to ‘expose‘ yourself to this sort of vial action against hard working Americans.  It is after all, your money!

Another food stamp fraud bust

Most Americans know that we’re going broke. . .  fast!  But how many know that we’re helping the thieves run us over the economic cliff?  Do people not ask why their government is doing this to them?  Have they not figured out the end objective of all this illogical behavior?  Do they not see that we are being guided, no forced into at 17’th century form of government?

As the kids say today. . .   WTF?

 

 

.

Guns, Politics

Aurora Shooting Fallout

1 Comment

Today unbelievable things are happening in this country.  But not to be outdone, consequences of those things are unimaginable!!  If you think the Aurora shooting was dramatically unbelievable, read the following ‘fallout’ article.

Century Aurora 16 movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. (Photo: Reuters/Evan Semon)

Four survivors of the July 20, 2012, movie theater massacre in Aurora, Colo., are on the hook for nearly $700,000 in legal fees after their lawsuit against Cinemark failed earlier this year. A Colorado law allows the winning side of civil cases to seek costs from the plaintiffs, and a judge ruled this week in favor of the theater, ordering the plaintiffs to pay Cinemark’s hefty legal bill.

Over 40 survivors of the attack have been trying to sue the theater chain for the last four years, according to an in-depth report from the Los Angeles Times. The plaintiffs argued that the theater’s relaxed security measures allowed the shooter—then-25-year-old James Holmes—to enter the theater and fire into the audience unchallenged.

After the lawsuit failed at the state level, the victims took their case to federal court. At the conclusion of the proceedings, U.S. District Judge R. Brooke Jackson informed the survivors he was planning to rule in favor of the theater—Cinemark could not have known Holmes was planning an attack, and even increased security measures would not have stopped him.

Jackson urged the plaintiffs to settle with Cinemark, and the victims were prepared to take the theater’s offer of $150,000 split among the 41 plaintiffs, according to the Times. The theater would also commit to taking additional measures to protect its patrons.

But one of the plaintiffs rejected the deal at the last minute. Two of her children had been killed in the shooting: one who was with her and one she was carrying. The gunshot wounds she sustained also left her paralyzed.

“It was done then,” Marcus Weaver, one of the survivors, told the Times. Thirty-seven plaintiffs immediately removed themselves from the case. The four who remained now owe the theater chain nearly $700,000.

“Theaters aren’t any safer,” Weaver said. “It’s almost like everything was for naught.”

If Cinemark had lost the case, theaters around the country could have been forced to beef up their security measures—a costly proposition for theaters already running a tight budget and one that would have increased ticket prices, according to the NY Daily News.

Cinemark may have won its day in court, but Colorado gun owners are still fighting to repeal the gun control measures passed in the wake of the attack. Universal background checks and a magazine ban are still in place, but the State Senate recently passed a repeal of the magazine restriction. That legislation should be considered by the House next legislative session.

 

When do you think we’ll catch on?!  Which is right, ‘safe zones’ or reasonable security?

 

 

.

 

Politics, Public Interest

Kalifornia — An Indicator of Our Future?

Leave a comment

People often ask why I moved from California to Texas.  Typically I hesitate trying to think of a succinct response.  But in that moment a ‘flood of reasons’ fly into my head.  At one time I thought I found the best place to live in the world — California.  Today, I hate even visiting there.

I hesitate to suggest it, but believe it isn’t totally out of the realm of reason to believe that California is the de facto leader of this country.  After all, look at the number of trends that started there..?

So now that once great state is leading the way toward the outlawing of guns — not a few, but most.  The following are the gun laws being sought by the lawmakers in Sacramento.  If you’re a gun owner, this should have you very worried!  You could become a felon as of January 1st and may not even know it!

  • AB 1135 (Levine) Firearms: assault weapons – Expand the definition of assault weapons based on whether a semiautomatic firearm has a detachable magazine, banning thousands of popular firearms [e.g., hunting rifles]
  • AB 1511 (Santiago) Firearms: lending – Make it illegal to loan a firearm to a person who is personally known to you (except for family members with restrictions)
  • AB 1673 (Gipson) Firearms: unfinished frame or receiver –  Expand the definition of a firearm to partially finished frames and receivers and require their registration [probably upper/lower receivers for AR’s]
  • AB 1674 (Santiago) Firearms: transfers – Make it illegal to buy or receive more than one firearm in any 30 day period
  • AB 1695 (Bonta) Firearms: false reports –  Expand the definition of a firearm to partially finished frames and receivers (no definition of what this means) and require their registration [probably upper/lower receivers for AR’s]
  • SB 880 (Hall) Firearms: assault weapons – Expand the definition of assault weapons based on whether a semiautomatic firearm has a detachable magazine, banning thousands of popular firearms [e.g., hunting rifles]
  • SB 894 (Jackson) Firearms: lost or stolen: reports – Make it a crime not to report lost and stolen firearms to law enforcement
  • SB 1235 (de Leon) Ammunition –  Require authorization to buy ammunition and track what and how much ammunition each person buys, creating a database of ammunition purchasers
  • SB 1446 (Hancock) Firearms: magazine capacity – Make it illegal to possess magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds no matter how long a person has owned them [no grandfather clause]

And by the way, these laws apply to current and retired police also!  For example, imagine having what used to be a hunting rifle with a five shot magazine which would have never been considered an ‘assault rifle’, and now it is on the banned list in the great communist state of California.  One must wonder how many more people will be bailing out of there because of this ‘issue’..?

And people wonder why there’s so many homes being built in Texas lately.

 

.

 

Politics

American Exceptionalism

4 Comments

Many of you can remember our ’emperor’ Obama once saying that America is not an exceptional country.  Many of you were were incensed by that statement, and reasonably so.  Since, we’ve been waiting for a leader who believes in our unique status in the world and who celebrates it — by his actions and words.

Check out a statement once made by Donald Trump on this topic.  Regardless of what he says today, do you believe him then or now?

 

And trust me, Hillary is just as bad or worse.  But neither of them believe in the reason why we are exceptional and/or don’t understand the history behind that statement.  They apparently either don’t know or don’t care that our founders created a new society in this country that was truly based on unique principles that did not exist anywhere else at the time.  Consequently they created a country that became highly successful and was a template for success — for other countries to follow.

I guess that’s why they don’t teach history in this country any longer..?   :-(

 

 

.

 

.

 

 

 

Islam, Politics, Public Interest, Religion

‘Refugee’ Update Here in the U.S.

6 Comments

Although I receive dozens of updates on the ‘refugee program’ every week, I’ve chosen to (re)post just a handful of them to give you an idea of how it’s going.  I think the conclusion you come to is, we’re going to be in trouble soon..?

High Costs of Resettling Refugees

Don’t you feel fortunate being able to spend a LOT of our tax dollars supporting non-working ‘refugees’ here in America who typically don’t even support our way of life?  Especially when it costs so little to support them in their current neighborhood.

Norway’s Boarder Fence

Who says the Russians are dummies?  They’ve obviously figured out their refugee problem.

More Refugees and More MONEY for FY2017

Take note of the number of ‘refugees’ they plan on adding in 2016 and 2017.  Click on the RCUSA link to read the actual text.  And when you read their projected numbers consider this, the generally accepted bottom number estimate for fundamentalist or radicals is 13%.  Do the math and ask yourself how long it will take for this country to be one big war zone..?

If you think we’re not under attack, you’ve obviously not been paying attention.  Our own government has been keeping the boarders open for decades letting ‘illegals’ come into the U.S. for a reason — not necessarily the ones you’ve heard.  People have argued for some time ‘why’ this has been allowed — by the left and the right.  Now we’re bringing people into this country that should be an obvious threat to the well-being of the U.S. citizens.

Regardless if you agree with my view as to the ‘why’, one thing should be clear and not arguable — our country is changing into a third world environment.  Fast!!

I recognize you can’t do anything but vote people into office to alter our course.  But I’d suggest you also prepare for what’s next.

 

 

.